Scorekeeping for Conversation-Construction
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we try to lay the foundation for an informational model of human conversations that formally speci es, for each stage of a conversation, what information is or is not made available to conversants through various forms of \cuings" that occur in the conversation. Squarely facing the fact that multiple lines of cuings often co-occur and interact with each other in the course of an actual conversation, we classify, illustrate, and mathematically characterize their interactions on the basis of Barwise and Seligman's general theory of information ow (1997). A conversation is what conversants construct. Thus, to explain the construction of a conversation is to explain the conversants' behaviors. We may try to do the latter in various ways. With \conversation analysts" (e.g. Sacks et al. 1974), we may appeal to some social conventions that the participants actually attend to and comply with. Or with \discourse analysts" (e.g. Labov and Fanshel 1977), we may appeal to general rules specifying possible sequences of speech acts. Or we might combine two approaches (Traum 1994) or take still another approach. Whatever path we may take, such an endeavor must involve or presuppose some explanation of what information is or is not available to the conversants at a given stage of the conversation. For example, the application of a particular item of the turn-exchange rules would crucially depend on the information available to conversants about the turn-occupancy state at the point; likewise, depending on what information is assumed to be available to a conversant concerning the prior sequence of speech acts, the sequencing rules on speech acts predict di erent behaviors of the participant. In most cases, theorists manage to correctly guess the available information to a participant (by \putting themselves in his or her position") to make speci c predictions about the conversant's behaviors. This practice, however, runs the risk of trivializing whatever theory one may have Also with Nara Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
منابع مشابه
Meaning and Demonstration
In demonstration, speakers use real-world activity both for its practical effects and to help make their points. The demonstrations of origami mathematics, for example, reconfigure pieces of paper by folding, while simultaneously allowing their author to signal geometric inferences. Demonstration challenges us to explain how practical actions can get such precise significance and how this meani...
متن کاملPaper Titles and Abstracts: Robert Stalnaker (mit): Common Ground and Keeping Score
This paper is an attempt to address two of the workshop themes, namely the question as to what theoretical purposes semantic contents serve, and how theories that invoke semantic contents should deal with the phenomenon of context dependence. I assume that what is at issue is the role that semantic contents play in a theory of natural language semantics. I also assume that such a theory should ...
متن کاملA Conversation Analytic Study on the Teachers’ Management of Understanding-Check Question Sequences in EFL Classrooms
Teacher questions are claimed to be constitutive of classroom interaction because of their crucial role both in the construction of knowledge and the organization of classroom proceedings (Dalton Puffer, 2007). Most of previous research on teachers’ questions mainly focused on identifying and discovering different question types believed to be helpful in creating the opportunities for learners’...
متن کاملScorekeeping in a language game
At any stage in a well-run conversation, a certain amount is presupposed. The parties to the conversation take it for granted; or at least they purport to, whether sincerely or just “for the sake of the argument”. Presuppositions can be created or destroyed in the course of a conversation. This change is rule-governed, at least up to a point. The presuppositions at time r’ depend, in a way abou...
متن کاملConditionals, Individual Variation, and the Scorekeeping Task
In this manuscript we study individual variation in the interpretation of conditionals by establishing individual profiles of the participants based on their behavioral responses and reflective attitudes. To investigate the participants’ reflective attitudes we introduce a new experimental paradigm called the Scorekeeping Task, and a Bayesian mixture model tailored to analyze the data. The goal...
متن کامل